Lots of people, friends and family, have fallen in love with "The Artist". There's a lot to fall in love with here. It's one of the best films of this year though a Facebook friend or two would like to expand the time line to the best of the decade. Not too sure about that, but this is certainly a cinematic wonder to behold.
I was afraid at first that this was going to be a gimmick----oh, for those of you living under the proverbial cinematic rock, "The Artist" is a silent movie (almost) set in the silent movie era, about people who make silent movies. And of course it's about the advent of talking pictures. In unskilled hands it could make for some awful filmmaking. Gratefully, no unskilled hands here.
The wonderful thing about the silent era was that it fostered, well, really invented a visual language for cinema. Story had to be conveyed through movement, action, expression, angle, etc. mit out sound as the Germans used to say. (By the way, for all my industry friends that's where the phrase M.O.S. comes from). The silent era was the era of story told through motion and picture---motion pictures.
History lesson done.
Jean Dujardin plays George Valentin, a suave and charismatic silent film star. With a cute sidekick dog, fan adoration, and a big house with a life size portrait of himself, he would seem to have it all. Actually he does have it all. What he can't see (or hear) is the advent of the talking picture that's about to send his career in a downward spiral.
A young actress with star-making potential and a name to match,
Peppy Miller, (played sweetly by Berenice Bejo) has a flirtation with George and a love interest is born. But Peppy is the future and George, well, not so much. His inevitable spiral is where the story bogs down a little. It's pretty predictable all things considered and moves forward to a resolution as old as the hills. If this movie was about the plotline, we'd have trouble.
"The Artist" isn't about the destination, it's about the journey. And this journey is often breathtakingly original. As Peppy pines for George in his dressing room, she sees his coat and hat on a rack and slips her arm into the sleeve, caressing her own body as if it were George. It's intimate and beautiful. And that's just a taste. The film is by turns delightful, original, charming, honest and surprising in execution if not in storyline. "The Artist" is a whimsical and wonderful journey on a familiar road. Best of the year? Quite possibly. Best of the decade? Ummm.... there's a lot of room for debate.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Overall we agree on this film being very good, although I am a person that puts this film in a higher standing, being a potential masterpiece. You and I have already had this argument, which you say is no real argument (you're right.) but I'll record it anyway.
ReplyDeleteNice review on the Artist. Read a couple others and enjoyed them too! help me out here though. Wasn't the look of the film, I am talking shot selection, as well as technological elements, more an homage to the films of the 30's and 40's? ...
You say the plot is somewhat predictable and I would almost agree, but I think that is a possible oversight.I say the seeming simplicity of the plot is a big part of what makes this film a true gem, if not a masterpiece. I am wondering if the director/ filmmaker wasn't also paying tribute to the great romantic comedies of the 30's? Also when Chaplin made Modern Times in 1935/6, it was almost a silent film. He didn't want to betray the charm of the tramp. It was his great farewell to the silent era. But film making had advanced dramatically during those 5 years or so, and some of the great plays or otherwise playwrights of the theater were finding their voice on film. This is to say, the Artist speaks to the silent era through the filter of the era which followed it. The era often referred to as the Golden Age of Hollywood.
I hope everyone who reads this blog is encouraged to see it.